<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>AfricaFocus Bulletin: Health</title>
<description>Most Recent Ten Issues</description>
<link>http://www.africafocus.org/</link>
<atom:link href="http://www.africafocus.org/rss_health10.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
  
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>Africa: Decisive Year for Global Fund
</title>
<link>http://www.africafocus.org/docs12/gf1205.php</link>
<pubDate>9, May 012 </pubDate>
<description>May 9, 2012 -
"We write as global health groups, communities affected by
HIV, TB, and Malaria, and researchers from around the world
to urge you not to undermine the founding principle of a
demand-driven Global Fund. We are united against proposals
to set 'envelopes' or 'allocations' for each country, which
would result in limited ambition, scaled back or skewed
plans, and ultimately a failure to get ahead of death and
new infections. Limiting ambition now will only cost more in
the future - in lives and money." - civil society letter to
Global Fund Board
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Africa: "New Structural Economics"
</title>
<link>http://www.africafocus.org/docs12/wb1204b.php</link>
<pubDate>11 Apr 2012</pubDate>
<description>Apr 11, 2012 -
AfricaFocus Bulletin<br/>
Apr 11, 2012 (120411)<br/>
(Reposted from sources cited below)
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Africa: Issues for the World Bank
</title>
<link>http://www.africafocus.org/docs12/wb1204a.php</link>
<pubDate>11 Apr 2012</pubDate>
<description>Apr 11, 2012 -
Despite the tilted voting structure and the likely victory
of the candidate nominated by U.S. President Obama, the
contest for the new World Bank president, who will be chosen
next week by the World Bank board, has been the subject of
unprecedented open debate. Any of the three candidates
would, in different ways, break the mold of selection of a
white male American economist or foreign policy veteran.
But, of equal importance, and much less discussed, any of
the candidates would also head up an institution with a
contradictory mix of old practices and new ideas, despite
the demise of the market-fundamentalist "Washington
consensus."
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Africa: BRICS Stepping Up on Global Health
</title>
<link>http://www.africafocus.org/docs12/brics1204.php</link>
<pubDate>4, Apr 012 </pubDate>
<description>Apr 4, 2012 -
When the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa)
countries met for their fourth summit in New Delhi last
month, the event attracted little attention from the Western
press. The New York Times headlined its report "BRICS
Leaders Fail to Create Rival to World Bank," noting that the
summit only created a working group to consider such a new
development bank next year. But the common tendency to
dismiss the group because of its internal diversity risks
ignoring the steady emergence of greater influence for its
members beyond their obvious growing economic weight.
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Africa: Funding Slowdowns Hit AIDS Programs
</title>
<link>http://www.africafocus.org/docs12/hiv1202.php</link>
<pubDate>1, Mar 012 </pubDate>
<description>Mar 1, 2012 -
In the last 15 years, AIDS activists and medical
professionals, in Africa and around the world, have won the
recognition that the fight against AIDS, which
disproportionately affects the African continent, is a
shared global responsibility.
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Africa: Counting the Costs of Brain Drain
</title>
<link>http://www.africafocus.org/docs12/bd1202a.php</link>
<pubDate>10 Feb 2012</pubDate>
<description>Feb 10, 2012 -
According to a study published in the British Medical
Journal in November 2011, nine sub-Saharan countries
(Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania,
Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe) invested some $2 billion in
costs of educating doctors who subsequently emigrated to the
United States, United Kingdom, Australia, or Canada. The
receiving countries gained an estimated $4.55 billion from
these investments, in savings from medical education
that they did not have to finance. The familiar phenomenon
of "brain drain," it is clear, should also be seen as a
subsidy from developing to developed countries.
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Africa: Paying for Health
</title>
<link>http://www.africafocus.org/docs12/hf1202.php</link>
<pubDate>3, Feb 012 </pubDate>
<description>Feb 3, 2012 -
"Simply put, if we allow the fund to fail, many people will
die, and we will forfeit the chance at the "AIDS-free
generation" that U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
called for in November. This is no time to step back." -
Paul Farmer
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Africa: Eliminating Malaria
</title>
<link>http://www.africafocus.org/docs11/mal1110.php</link>
<pubDate>20 Oct 2011</pubDate>
<description>Oct 20, 2011 -
"Over the past decade, scaling up the delivery of existing
interventions [against malaria] is estimated to have saved
more than one million lives in Africa alone, with the
majority of these deaths averted since 2007. That was the
year when the big push to improve coverage really hit the
ground." - Dr. Margaret Chan, Director-General, World
Health Organization
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>South Africa: Taking Leadership in AIDS Fight
</title>
<link>http://www.africafocus.org/docs11/hiv1107.php</link>
<pubDate>5, Jul 011 </pubDate>
<description>Jul 5, 2011 -
South Africa's 5th AIDS conference, held from June 7-10 this
year, marked a remarkable turnaround in the country's
efforts against the AIDS pandemic. Achievements noted
included bringing 400,000 additional AIDS patients into
antiretroviral treatment within the last year, raising the
total to 1.4 million; cutting the cost of antiretroviral
therapy in half over six months; and extending treatment
using trained nurses to more than 1,600 health facilities.
Most important of all has been a strong spirit of
collaboration among the government, medical specialists, and
activists.
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Africa: "War on Drugs" Blowback Effects
</title>
<link>http://www.africafocus.org/docs11/wod1106.php</link>
<pubDate>14 Jun 2011</pubDate>
<description>Jun 14, 2011 -
"Vast expenditures on criminalization and repressive measures
directed at producers, traffickers and consumers of illegal
drugs have clearly failed to effectively curtail supply or
consumption. [at the same time] the implementation of the war on
drugs has generated widespread negative consequences for
societies in producer, transit and consumer countries,
[including] the growth of a 'huge criminal black market',
financed by the risk-escalated profits of supplying
international demand for illicit drugs." - Global Commission on
Drug Policy
</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

