news analysis advocacy
tips on searching

Search AfricaFocus and 9 Partner Sites

 

 

Visit the AfricaFocus
Country Pages

Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central Afr. Rep.
Chad
Comoros
Congo (Brazzaville)
Congo (Kinshasa)
Côte d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
São Tomé
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Western Sahara
Zambia
Zimbabwe

Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail!

Print this page

Note: This document is from the archive of the Africa Policy E-Journal, published by the Africa Policy Information Center (APIC) from 1995 to 2001 and by Africa Action from 2001 to 2003. APIC was merged into Africa Action in 2001. Please note that many outdated links in this archived document may not work.


Africa: Education for All, 2

Africa: Education for All, 2
Date distributed (ymd): 000425
Document reposted by APIC

+++++++++++++++++++++Document Profile+++++++++++++++++++++

Region: Continent-Wide
Issue Areas: +economy/development+
Summary Contents:
This is one of two postings today containing documents related to the Education for All theme featured at the World Education Forum (Dakar 2000), being held in Dakar, Senegal from April 26-28, 2000. For extensive information on the Forum see the Forum home page
(http://www2.unesco.org/wef). Additional links are included in the other posting today, with an article reporting on African developments in UNESCO'S EFA Bulletin.

This posting features a statement by the non-governmental Global Campaign for Education. Additional information on the campaign can be found on the site of Community Aid Abroad -- Oxfam Australia
(http://www.caa.org.au/oxfam/advocacy/education/news) There is also a campaign web site
(http://www.campaignforeducation.org). Unfortunately it features graphics-intense, hard-to-print and hard-to-read pages, but it does have some up-to-date information on Campaign activities at the Dakar meeting. Oxfam's 1999 paper "Education Now: Break the Cycle of Poverty" can be found at (http://www.caa.org.au/oxfam/advocacy/education/report).

Later this week the APIC/ECA Electronic Roundtable will open its fourth session, on Education and Culture, with initial panel presentations. To sign up or to review the archive of earlier sessions, visit the Roundtable home page (http://www.africapolicy.org/rtable). Additional resources on education and culture can be found on the Africa Policy web site at:
http://www.africapolicy.org/featdocs/educ.htm and
http://www.africapolicy.org/books/educ.htm

+++++++++++++++++end profile++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The World Education Forum in Dakar, success or failure?
Our bottom line position.

April 2000

The Global Campaign for Education, a coalition of civil society organisations working on education all over the world, has developed the following core positions on the forthcoming World Education Forum in Dakar, drawing on regional consultation processes (including conferences in Johannesburg, Santa Domingo, Bangkok, Recife and Accra). We will judge the success of the Dakar Forum on whether it achieves the following:

1. An unequivocal commitment to free and compulsory education as a basic right for all children up to the age of 15 by 2015.

Dakar must agree explicit statements opposing all forms of cost-sharing and cost-recovery in basic (primary and lower secondary) education. Where it is necessary for governments to raise additional revenue for basic education, this should be done through equitable and transparent forms of taxation rather than through flat-rate fees and unregulated local levies, which penalise the poor. There should be a direct recognition that such approaches effectively deny poor people, and especially girls, their right to education.

In order to ensure that the momentum towards this is developed, Dakar should agree a commitment to providing free basic education for all children by 2005 (i.e. removing all direct costs of basic education by this date). There should be a re-statement of the commitment to achieve gender parity in basic education by 2005. There should also be clear statements made that education is a basic right of all citizens and a key responsibility of the State.

2. Clear and time-bound processes for countries to agree their own targets and plans of action for achieving Education for All goals, with binding mechanisms for civil society participation.

The Jomtien Declaration failed in large part due to a lack of targets that were both clear and realistic and also nationally owned. Signatories to the Dakar Framework must commit themselves to developing national plans of action for education by 2002.These plans must be transparently and democratically negotiated with all significant national stakeholders, and set out how to achieve national education goals within the broad framework of the 2015 targets, and within government expenditure frameworks.

A central part of these plans should be the agreement by 2001 of clear and binding mechanisms for the ongoing democratic participation of civil society in framing national education strategies and increasing accountability to citizens and civil society organisations across all levels of the education system. An enabling environment for NGOs asnd civil society coalitions on education is essential if they are to become constructive partners in achieving education for all.

National action plans must demonstrate how the quality of education will be improved, to ensure that all formal and non-formal public education is relevant, responds to local contexts, and achieves explicit targets for learning achievement. National strategies should include costed and practical steps to address the need to bring high-quality teaching skills and active learning to every public school. They should also include steps to create decentralised accountability and democratic oversight at every level of the education system, from local schools and district authorities to provincial and national ministries. Specific attention should be given to developing mechanisms to involve teachers, parents and children in the management of schools.

Each national plan should include a gender audit to track trends in and reasons for gender disparities, and the national education plans must include explicit, costed and time-bound proposals for removing the causes of these disparities by 2005.

3. Commitment to a Global Action Plan with clear resource commitments by governments and donors

The Dakar Forum must agree a Global Action Plan that will ensure that no government that is serious about education is denied the necessary resources to achieve basic education for all. This Plan would include a Compact for Africa to address Africa's particular resource constraints. Such a plan would require joint government and donor action.

Governments must commit themselves publicly to guaranteeing their part of the necessary resources for basic education, including increases in the proportion of GDP allocated to basic education where necessary (e.g. to a minimum of 4% in low-income countries). Governments should be urged to secure increases in revenue from progressive taxation, reduce excessive military expenditure and other unproductive expenditures; and prioritise investment in basic education while ensuring a balanced, poverty-focused investment in upper secondary and higher education.

Donors must ensure that all governments that are serious about education have access to the necessary resources to achieve basic education for all. A key step towards this will be to increase aid to basic education from the current level of 2% to at least 8% of total aid budgets, to increase overall aid budgets and to ensure that low-income countries receive an appropriate share of aid flows. Grants and debt relief, rather than loans, should be the main forms of finance for basic education.

Donors should commit to increased and rapid debt relief, improving progress of the Heavily Indebted Poor Country initiative (HIPC2). Debt relief should add to aid flows and not undermine them, and be linked to the national education plans in the context of wider poverty reduction plans.

4. Clear commitments made to improving equity in the quality of education

Poor people generally receive low quality education and expansion of access has often led to a further loss of quality. It is essential that quality be recognised as an equity issue. The challenge should be to work towards equity in quality. Governments should immediately identify and reverse existing disparities in per capita funding which discriminate against rural communities, ethnic minorities and underdeveloped regions, in order to achieve equitable spending per learner by 2005. They should further commit themselves to delivering extra funding to meet the needs of schools in poor and marginalised areas, in order to bring all schools up to agreed national standards of quality by 2015 and to ensure that curricula, teaching materials and methods are responsive to the needs of marginalised groups..

5. Clear commitments made to improve the quality and nature of aid to education

The quality of aid must be improved, with a greater focus on poverty, reduced reliance on expatriate technical assistance and increased national ownership. Most importantly, education aid must become truly co-ordinated - with the national education plans acting as the basis for coordinated sector-wide budgetary support in the context of national poverty reduction strategies.

A core code of conduct should be agreed to bind donors to following good practices in the disbursement of aid to education. For example, governments should have single accountability lines rather than having to respond to multiple and bureaucratic donor requirements. The monitoring and control of aid programmes should be turned over to government in partnership with civil society. Consultative Group meetings should be held in and chaired by the host country, and civil society groups from that country should be allowed to attend these meetings. Aid commitments should be provided within a medium-term framework to ease government planning and ensure predictable resource flows. An urgent review should be undertaken by each donor agency to determine the reasons for non-disbursed aid and to change their own practices and procedures to increase future rates of disbursement. Donors should immediately abolish all procedures and requirements that result in the tying of education aid to donor-country goods and services, and procurement policy must be reformed to encourage the development of local contracting. Governments should decide what technical assistance they need and who should provide it.

Positive changes to aid must not be contradicted or undermined by wider institutional policies of the IMF or World Bank. Policy advice and financial support from the IMF, World Bank or regional development banks, must keep education in central focus at all times. All programmes should be designed with education as an integral part of poverty reduction and human development. In addition to ensuring that macro-economic policies and targets prioritise poverty reduction (e.g. including aid grants in calculations of the fiscal deficit, reviewing inflation targets etc.), this would also include ensuring protection of access to basic education during financial crisis, and support for free basic education.

6. Clear and measurable commitment made to adult literacy and a re-statement of the vision of life-long learning.

The low priority attached to adult learning in the past decade must be reversed, with women's literacy accorded the same high level priority as that accorded to the education of girls. A clear goal should be established, at least to end gender disparities in adult literacy by 2010. A clear statement should be made about the importance of integrating adult literacy with wider processes of community development and empowerment.

Since Jomtien the vision of Education For All has been reduced in practice to "Education For School-Age Children". The expanded vision must be asserted to prevent utilitarian interpretations that justify investment in education only by its knock on effects. Education is a right and that right starts from early childhood and continues through adulthood into old age.

7. Strategic recognition of the present and future impact of HIV/AIDs on education and its resource implications

In the coming decade, particularly in Africa, but increasingly across the world, HIV/AIDs will have a devastating impact on education systems. Governments need to develop innovative responses to ensure that children in families affected by HIV/AIDS will not lose their access to education. Plans need to be made now to cope with the loss of teachers and with the new pressures on children.

8. Democratisation, decentralisation and empowerment of the present Education For All structures and mechanisms.

The present EFA structures set up after Jomtien are too centralised in Paris and lack legitimate representation from southern governments or civil society. This has led to a lack of ownership and a loss of momentum. Agreement needs to be reached to ensure strong representation of southern governments and civil society in international EFA structures post-Dakar. Resources, technical expertise and monitoring of progress also need to be decentralised with major investment in a regional level EFA capacity, particularly for Sub-Saharan Africa. The building up of human resources at a regional level must be given priority - replacing the domination of structures and processes by Northern experts and consultants.

At the same time these more representative international structures need to be empowered. The right to education is already enshrined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but there are no mechanisms for enforcing this right. National civil society alliances with legitimate concerns should have the right to call for the international EFA structures to investigate cases where there are clear violations of the right to education. The EFA structures should then have the power to call for an investigation by the UN Special Rapporteur on Education or the regional Human Rights Commissions. If these find against a government they can call for sanctions.

9. A commitment to a mid-term global review and a possible official UN Conference.

A comprehensive review should be planned for 2006 to identify progress against the major international targets on education. Both national and donor action plans should specify mid-term targets for each EFA goal, and specify explicit additional resourcing and contingency commitments if these targets are missed. If the mid-term review shows that a substantial number of countries continue to be off-track then an official UN Conference on Education with Heads of State should be convened for 2010 at the latest. This would help to catalyse the additional momentum that would clearly be needed with just five years to go to 2015.

THE GLOBAL CAMPAIGN FOR EDUCATION CALLS FOR THE FOLLOWING FROM THE WORLD EDUCATION FORUM IN DAKAR:

  1. An unequivocal commitment to free education as a basic right for all children up to the age of 15 by 2015;
  2. Agreement on clear and time-bound follow up processes at a national level, with binding mechanisms for civil society participation;
  3. Commitment to a global action plan with clear resource commitments by governments and donors;
  4. Clear commitments to be made to improving equity in the quality of education;
  5. Clear commitments to improving the quality and nature of aid to education;
  6. A clear and measurable commitment to adult literacy and a re-statement of the vision of life-long learning;
  7. A strategic recognition of the present and future impact of HIV/AIDs on education;
  8. The democratisation, decentralisation and empowerment of the Education For All structures and mechanisms;
  9. A commitment to a mid-term global review and a possible official UN Conference with Heads of State in 2010.

This material is being reposted for wider distribution by the Africa Policy Information Center (APIC). APIC's primary objective is to widen international policy debates around African issues, by concentrating on providing accessible policy-relevant information and analysis usable by a wide range of groups and individuals.

URL for this file: http://www.africafocus.org/docs00/ed0004b.php