news analysis advocacy
tips on searching

Search AfricaFocus and 9 Partner Sites

 

 

Visit the AfricaFocus
Country Pages

Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central Afr. Rep.
Chad
Comoros
Congo (Brazzaville)
Congo (Kinshasa)
Côte d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
São Tomé
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Western Sahara
Zambia
Zimbabwe

Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail!

Print this page

Note: This document is from the archive of the Africa Policy E-Journal, published by the Africa Policy Information Center (APIC) from 1995 to 2001 and by Africa Action from 2001 to 2003. APIC was merged into Africa Action in 2001. Please note that many outdated links in this archived document may not work.


Africa: Privatization and World Bank

Africa: Privatization and World Bank
Date distributed (ymd): 011019
Document reposted by APIC

Africa Policy Electronic Distribution List: an information service provided by AFRICA ACTION (incorporating the Africa Policy Information Center, The Africa Fund, and the American Committee on Africa). Find more information for action for Africa at http://www.africapolicy.org

+++++++++++++++++++++Document Profile+++++++++++++++++++++

Region: Continent-Wide
Issue Areas: +economy/development+

SUMMARY CONTENTS:

This posting contains (1) a request for organizational sign-ons to letters from the Ghana National Coalition against Privatisation of Water, and (2) a background article on World Bank policies on privatization of public services from the Globalization Challenge Initiative. Additional related background information and links can be found in earlier postings at
http://www.africafocus.org/docs01/wat0103.php>
and
http://www.africafocus.org/docs01/wat0105.php>

Water in Public Hands: Public sector water management, June 2001, which presents evidence in favor of strong public sector involvement as opposed to indiscriminate privatization, is available, in Word format, at:
http://www.psiru.org/reports/2001-06-W-public.doc

A new factsheet with questions and answers on The World Bank and Denial of Africa's Right to Health is available at: http://www.africapolicy.org/action/wb0110.htm

+++++++++++++++++end profile++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Ghana National Coalition Against Privatisation of Water c/o Integrated Social Development Centre (ISODEC), P.O. Box 19452, Accra North, Ghana; Email: isodec@ghana.com or ramenga@isodec.org.gh; Fax: 233/21 311687; Tel: 233/21 30606

[For additional information in U.S. contact: Globalization Challenge Initiative (http://www.challengeglobalization.org; sgrusky@igc.org; tel: 301-445-5205)]

Request for Organizational Signatures on Letter
[e-mail address for signatures: waterforall@igc.org. Sign-ons should be submitted by the deadline of November 15, 2001]

Dear Sisters and Brothers around the World:

We call upon organizations and individuals around the world to express their international solidarity with the struggle of the Ghanaian people to stop the privatisation of the Accra-Tema water service. World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) policies require the Government of Ghana to increase water tariffs (consumer fees for water) and privatise water in order to gain access to external assistance and soft loans. Five multinational corporations have bid for the Accra-Tema water service, most of them with annual sales income larger than the GDP of Ghana, and some of them with questionable social and environmental records.

The Christian Council of Ghana, The Trade Union Congress, the Ghana National Association of Teachers, the Ghana Registered Nurses Association, the Convention People's Party and many other groups in Ghana have joined to stop the water privatization. Express your solidarity! Show your support for the struggle to stop the world-wide attempt to commodify water for the profit and benefit of a few. Sign on to the letters below to the IMF, the World Bank and the President of Ghana by sending your name and organizational affiliation to waterforall@igc.org

Sincerely, Ghana National Coalition Against Privatisation of Water

Letter 1

To: Mr. Callisto Madavo
Africa Region Vice President
World Bank

Mr. Peter Harrold,
Country Director for Ghana
World Bank

We, the undersigned citizen's organizations from around the world, support the right of the citizen's of Ghana to participate in public debate, discussion and decision-making about whether the proposed leasing of the Accra-Tema water system to private transnational corporations (privatisation or private sector participation) is the best way to promote accessible and affordable water and to ensure public health, social equity and environmental sustainability.

There is widespread international concern about privatisation and cost recovery policies that treat water primarily as a commodity, or an economic good, to be bought and sold in the marketplace. There is concern that such policies increase the obstacles to clean and affordable water to which every person, rich or poor, man or woman, child or adult, is entitled. Clean water is essential to human life and a natural resource that should be held as a public trust for the common good of our societies and the environment.

We call upon the World Bank, in order to promote safe and affordable water for all people, and to support sovereign, democratic and participatory decision-making processes, to undertake the following:

  • Remove water privatization (leasing the Accra-Tema water system to private transnational corporations) as a condition for access to World Bank loans. We believe that it is inappropriate for the World Bank to impose water privatization as a condition for access to loans, debt relief, or other creditor or donor resources. World Bank conditionality should not intervene in the national debate and decision-making process. By imposing water privatization as a condition for access to Bank resources, there is a risk that the pressure on the government will reduce accountability to the concerns and viewpoints of citizens.
  • Remove increases in water fees (for low-income and marginalized populations that will be less able to afford safe water) as a condition for access to World Bank loans. Increased water fees can impact negatively upon access to safe and affordable water for low-income groups. Public subsidies, a guaranteed water lifeline, progressive tariff structures, cross-sectoral subsidies, and expanded access to potable water are critical to ensuring public health, social equity, and environmental sustainability.
  • Support the call to stop the "fast track" toward water privatisation. The citizen's of Ghana deserve the opportunity to publicly discuss and debate a wide variety of water management options. Citizens have a right to effectively participate in the shaping of national policies that fundamentally affect their lives such as the control and management of water. Support for the "fast track" toward water privatisation should be stopped until a broad and participatory process of debate, discussion and consultation takes place.
  • Support information disclosure to the public. Currently there are five multinational corporations bidding to lease the urban water service in the Accra metropolitan area. Information about the terms and conditions of the privatization, such as the proposed tariff structure, expansion plans, connection fees, and possible subsidies should be made available to the public for open debate and discussion.
  • Support measures to discourage corruption in international business. Support measures that will automatically exclude companies whose business practices have been known to exert corrupting influences on public officials anywhere in the world from participating in any bids.

We hope that you will be able to respond promptly and affirmatively to these concerns. The World Bank has publicly committed itself to making poverty reduction central and to promoting genuine national ownership of policies. This requires, among other things, supporting genuine processes of national debate, discussion, and citizen participation in policy decision-making, even when the policy choices being discussed may not be in consonance with World Bank opinion.

Sincerely,

Cc: Mr. James Wolfensohn, President, World Bank

Letter 2

His Excellency Mr. J.A. Kufuor
President of the Republic of Ghana,
The Castle, Osu, Accra

Dear President Kufuor,

We, the undersigned citizen's organizations from around the world, support the right of citizen's of Ghana to participate in public debate, discussion and decision-making about whether the proposed leasing of the Accra-Tema water system to private transnational corporations (privatisation or private sector participation) is the best way to promote accessible and affordable water and to ensure public health, social equity and environmental sustainability.

There is widespread international concern about privatisation and cost recovery policies that treat water primarily as a commodity, or an economic good, to be bought and sold in the marketplace. There is concern that such policies increase the obstacles to clean and affordable water to which every person, rich or poor, man or woman, child or adult, is entitled. Clean water is essential to human life and a natural resource that should be held as a public trust for the common good of our societies and the environment.

We call upon you to support transparent discussion and debate, and participatory decision making processes regarding the management of water, by implementing the proposals below:

  • Stop the "fast track" toward water privatisation. The citizen's of Ghana deserve the opportunity to publicly discuss and debate a wide variety of water management options. Citizens have a right to effectively participate in the shaping of national policies that fundamentally affect their lives such as the control and management of water. The "fast track" toward water privatisation should be stopped until a broad and participatory process of debate, discussion and consultation takes place.
  • Disclose information to the public. Currently there are five multinational corporations bidding to lease the urban water service in the Accra metropolitan area. Information about the terms and conditions of the privatisation, such as the proposed tariff structure, expansion plans, possible subsidies, and structures for accountability should be made available to the public for open debate and discussion.
  • Support measures to discourage corruption in international business transactions. Develop measures to automatically exclude companies whose business practices have been known to exert corrupting influences on public officials anywhere in the world from participating in any bids. We hope that you will be able to respond promptly and affirmatively to these concerns.

Sincerely,

Letter 3

To: Mr. G.E. Gondwe
Director, Africa Department
International Monetary Fund
Washington, D.C.

Mr. Hugh Bredenkamp
West Africa Region
International Monetary Fund
Washington, DC

We, the undersigned citizen's organizations from around the world, support the right of the citizen's of Ghana to participate in public debate, discussion and decision-making about whether the proposed leasing of the Accra-Tema water system to private transnational corporations (privatisation or private sector participation) is the best way to promote accessible and affordable water and to ensure public health, social equity and environmental sustainability.

There is widespread international concern about IMF policy conditions that impose full cost recovery as a step toward the privatization of public water utilities. There is concern that policies such as full cost recovery can increase the cost of water for low-income and marginalized populations. Clean water is essential to human life and a natural resource that should be held as a public trust for the common good of our societies and the environment.

We call upon the International Monetary Fund, in order to promote safe and affordable water for all people, and to support sovereign, democratic and participatory decision-making processes, to undertake the following:

  • Remove increased cost recovery (for low-income and marginalized populations that will be less able to afford safe water) as a condition for access to International Monetary Fund loans. The third review for Ghana's Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility loan includes conditions promoting full cost recovery in the public utilities and automatic tariff adjustment formula. Increased water fees can impact negatively upon access to safe and affordable water for low-income groups. Public subsidies, a guaranteed water lifeline, progressive tariff structures, cross-sectoral subsidies, and expanded access to potable water are critical to ensuring public health, social equity, and environmental sustainability.
  • Support the call to stop the "fast track" toward water privatisation. The citizens of Ghana deserve the opportunity to publicly discuss and debate a wide variety of water management options. Citizens have a right to effectively participate in the shaping of national policies that fundamentally affect their lives such as the control and management of water. Support for the "fast track" toward water privatisation should be stopped until a broad and participatory process of debate, discussion and consultation takes place.

We hope that you will be able to respond promptly and affirmatively to these concerns.

Sincerely,


Economic Justice News Vol. 4, No.3 October, 2001
http://www.50years.org/ejn/v4n3/index.htm

Service Apartheid: The World Bank's Private Sector Development Strategy and the PRSP

by Nancy Alexander, Globalization Challenge Initiative

The World Bank is soon likely to adopt a private sector development (PSD) strategy that will require the inclusion of the private sector in all infrastructure and social sector operations in the 78 low-income countries that depend on credits from the International Development Association (IDA). The PSD strategy threatens citizenship rights, jeopardizes affordable basic service provision and promotes a two-tier "separate and unequal" apartheid of access to basic services.

The World Bank should increase support for social investments by credits, debt reduction, etc. But in country after country, the World Bank-supported push to privatize health, education, and water systems is putting services out of the reach of ordinary people - and pushing control over public assets into the hands of multinational corporations. Increasingly, the Bank is reorienting lending to support private corporations, which means that its private sector portfolio and profitability grow as its policy "conditions" are adopted.

Alarmingly, such changes could be irreversible - "locked in" under trade liberalization agreements such as the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). Once governments allow competition in basic service sectors, GATS disciplines apply to such sectors and to government rules "affecting" such sectors. These disciplines would, among other things, bar a government from favoring a domestic provider or providers, from limiting foreign ownership and control, from limiting expansion of services or access to basic governmental or regulated "monopoly" infrastructure, e.g., drinking water and sanitation networks, power lines, possibly school and hospital systems.

This outcome could come at high democratic, budgetary and developmental cost. Citizens and governments in poor countries need more, not less, control over provision of basic needs. Even in developed countries with sophisticated regulatory systems, "private-public partnerships" - through contractual and other arrangements promoted as fostering competition and efficiency in basic services or key support services have, among other things, been costly to transact and to finance, have reduced budget flexibility over long periods of time, and have degraded public capability and introduced conflicts of interest. In countries with underdeveloped regulatory regimes, limited financial resources, and other weaknesses, liberalization of basic services can lead, not to healthy competition, but to the replacement of local public monopolies with multinational private monopolies or cartels such as the foreign for-profit international water giant Suez des Eaux. Such providers lack accountability to domestic consumers, citizens and governments.

The PSD strategy could:

1) undermine basic citizenship rights in borrowing countries.

Citizens have a right to determine their government's role in service delivery. Citizens also have rights to basic services, such as health, education and basic levels of water, sanitation and energy. Cash-strapped borrowers should not be coerced, especially in ways that short-circuit domestic decision-making.

2) widen the gap between rich and poor.

The PSD strategy seeks to attract investment capital to poor countries by carving out lucrative markets. "Cherry picking" richer customers would leave the poor to be served by an impoverished public water, power, health or school system. This could create systems of separate and very unequal services. The same is true of long-term service contracts that give discretion to the contractor where to cut cost, reduce service or impose fees. And contracts for specific services that guarantee attractive rates of return by guaranteeing long-term demand for services creates obstacles to healthy competition. Auctions to provide services are rarely a winning strategy - whether the service is water quality or airline security - given the built-in incentives to reduce service quality.

Finally, replacing universal service systems with segregated for-profit and subsidized loss-making systems ignores the fact that, as a rule, subsidy and exemption systems have failed to reach their targets - the people who need them. Even so, the Bank directs that "targeted subsidies are, if feasible, preferable to free provision." (World Bank Group, "PSD: Entrepreneurship, Markets and Development," May 9, 2001) This recommendation flies in the face of the U.S. Congress's demand, articulated in legislation last year, that the U.S. representatives at the World Bank and the regional development banks oppose any loans for basic services such as primary health care and primary education if they require "user fees" - charges that even the impoverished must pay. "Exemption systems," which aspire to locate the worst-off and certify them for free services, have almost never worked.

3) undermine efforts to foster homegrown development planning in borrowing countries. Since 1999, the IMF and World Bank have required each IDA borrower to prepare a development plan called a "Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper" (PRSP) that is acceptable to the Boards of the IMF and World Bank. Governments are asked to prepare their PRSP (preferably with input from citizens' groups) in order to qualify for concessional loans, grants, or debt reduction. Among other things, the PRSP demonstrates how fiscal resources (including resources freed up through debt reduction) are channeled into poverty reduction efforts, such as effective social service provision.

In PRSP processes, citizens' groups invariably call for universal access to high-quality public services. But they are discovering—as in a recent water-privatization loan for Uganda and a privatized education loan for Burkina Faso — that the World Bank sees privatization as the answer to nearly every infrastructure or social sector problem. This raises serious doubt about the genuineness of the public consultation process for PRSPs.

4) endanger service provision and risk lives and livelihoods.

In the past, the World Bank has insisted that privatization should be undertaken under the conditions that promote competition, discourage monopolies and where a strong regulatory system exists. Now, the World Bank has changed its tune. Its draft PSD strategy suggests that, in many cases, the weaker the regulatory structure in a country, the stronger the argument for free entry [by foreign corporations]. Privatization in an unregulated environment is a recipe for disaster. Low-income countries generally lack the competitive and well-regulated markets that are required to prevent rampant abuses (e.g. in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, robber barons transformed public monopolies into private monopolies.

Even where regulatory mechanisms are in place, the IMF and the World Bank do not always encourage protection of poor and vulnerable populations. Surveys of borrowers and Bank staff alike rank IDA as relatively ineffective in improving the status of the poor. This is clear in the case of Ghana where water tariffs have doubled in mid-2001 and are due to increase further. Still, the IMF and World Bank insist that Ghana's economy does not have the luxury of raising prices gradually or shielding consumers from price hikes: rates must be adjusted immediately to restore equilibrium.

Action Needed

Donor governments are currently finalizing policy directives for IDA as they prepare for a new round of contributions. IDA deputies - usually officials in finance or foreign ministries - should reconsider the PSD policy and call for small-scale experimentation. With IDA having already found that PSD projects do not effectively reduce poverty and are hampered by inattention to regulatory structures, the IDA deputies should insist that the World Bank thoroughly recast the proposed PSD strategy. See http://www.challengeglobalization.org for a list of IDA Deputies and details on how to contact them.


This material is being reposted for wider distribution by Africa Action (incorporating the Africa Policy Information Center, The Africa Fund, and the American Committee on Africa). Africa Action's information services provide accessible information and analysis in order to promote U.S. and international policies toward Africa that advance economic, political and social justice and the full spectrum of human rights.

URL for this file: http://www.africafocus.org/docs01/priv0110.php