Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail!
Print this page
Note: This document is from the archive of the Africa Policy E-Journal, published
by the Africa Policy Information Center (APIC) from 1995 to 2001 and by Africa Action
from 2001 to 2003. APIC was merged into Africa Action in 2001. Please note that many outdated links in this archived
document may not work.
US/Africa: Anti-War Statements, 2
Africa Policy E-Journal
March 7, 2003 (030307)
US/Africa: Anti-War Statements, 2
(Reposted from sources cited below)
This posting contains excerpts from an interview with Jibril
Muhammad Aminu, the outgoing ambassador of Nigeria to the the
United States, by allAfrica.com's Charles Cobb Jr. and Akwe Amosu.
Other postings today contain a press release from Africa Action and
TransAfrica Forum, along with other anti-war statements, and a
background report from the Association of Concerned Africa Scholars
on U.S. military programs in sub-Saharan Africa.
Cobb and Amosu also recently interviewed Senegal's foreign
minister, Cheikh Tidiane Gadio, on the war and related issues. See
Sharp Words On Iraq War From Outgoing Nigerian Ambassador
February 14, 2003
By Charles Cobb Jr. and Akwe Amosu
[excerpts only, used by permission. Full text, which covers
Nigerian and regional issues as well as the war, is available at:
Jibril Muhammad Aminu, Nigeria's ambassador to the United States
since November, 1999 is returning home after just over three years
in the post.
Professor Aminu, 62, a highly regarded member of the diplomatic
corps in Washington, began his life as a medical doctor, before
becoming the vice-chancellor of Maiduguri university in northern
Nigeria, 1980-85. He went on to serve as a minister of education
in Nigeria's federal government and as minister of petroleum until
1992. On the eve of the third republic, he became a foundation
member of the People's Democratic Party which went on to win the
first civilian election in June '98, bringing President Olusegun
Obasanjo into office.
Ambassador Aminu was a strong supporter of the anti-terrorism
coalition that quickly consoldated in the wake of the September 11,
2001 attacks. A war against terrorism is necessary, he says,
pointing out that Africa felt the effects of attacks long before
September 11. Giving particular relevance to that view, Osama Bin
Laden, in his February 10 statement, named two African countries -
Morocco and Nigeria - as "infidel regimes enslaved by the U.S." in
need of "liberation" by his supporters.
But, as in many nations in Africa, there is strong Nigerian
sentiment against the impending war with Iraq, sentiment that is
fully supported by the ambassador. So far, says the outspoken
diplomat, he has not received a satisfactory answer as to why war
with Iraq is necessary.
Africa's importance to Islam still goes unrecognized, says Jibril,
who is from the north-eastern Nigerian state of Adamawa and who is
returning home to campaign as a candidate for the Senate in
Nigeria's forthcoming April election. He spoke with AllAfrica's
Charles Cobb Jr. and Akwe Amosu. Excerpts:
Q: You are leaving Washington at a troubled moment. The
international consensus that seemed to exist after 9/11 appears to
have collapsed, as the United States moves toward war with Iraq.
What are your thoughts about this looming war and the implications
for Africa - particularly countries like Nigeria with large numbers
of Muslims in their populations?
The whole world sympathized with the United States and its
people over 9/11. That is very clear. Within a couple of weeks
after the incident, African presidents gathered and condemned
terrorism and undertook to work for its containment, to combat
We have many times made the point that what happened in New York
was very ghastly, but it wasn't the first one. A manifestation, a
dastardly act of terrorism occurred in Africa three years before -
in Nairobi and in Dar es Salaam. So Africa cannot be taken out of
the equation of the world fight against terrorism.
There is also the question of poverty. The more poverty is
entrenched in Africa, the more Africa will become a haven, a refuge
And a third issue to look at is the question of conflict in Africa
and how terrorists could take advantage of conflicts like the
conflict diamonds which would be effective in money-laundering,
people can always pocket diamonds and pass them on for sale. So
the conflicts in various parts of Africa like Angola, Sierra Leone,
Liberia - these are all areas where terrorists could find a way of
There are many other issues, but finally let me just mention one
other - this is the question of religion. Africa south of the
Sahara has a very large number of Muslims. It has many more Muslims
than the whole of the Gulf, and nobody talks about that. People do
not really include them. When ever people here talk about Islam,
they hear Egypt mentioned, or Libya, or Saudi Arabia - nobody
mentions that there are at least 60 million Muslims in Nigeria
alone. This number equals most of the countries in the Gulf put
This is very important for people trying to combat terrorism and
who mistakenly relate it to religion. They will find it important
to enter into some kind of dialogue or constructive program of
engagement with the Muslims in sub-Saharan Africa as a preventive
Q: How do you react to Osama Bin Laden reportedly saying that a
campaign of "liberation" against "infidel regimes' should be
launched? He named several countries as representing such regimes
which he said were enslaved by the U.S. Morocco was on that list.
So was Nigeria - your country.
He thinks there is potential in Nigeria. There are vocal
individuals in Nigeria. There are students who are free who have
been demonstrating one way or the other and some of them admire
him. So he will look at Nigeria as a potential area [for
recruiting support]. He probably meant [those people] to come under
his influence but that is not likely to happen in Nigeria.
By the way, I have my own personal worry as to whether this is
really Osama Bin Laden; I am still not completely convinced,
although there are a lot of technological gadgets that will help to
confirm if this is his voice.
Q: Does the link being proposed between Osama and Iraq make sense
[The events of 9/11] made people sympathize very much with the
United States. But we don't understand how this has been translated
into war against Iraq. And every time, you have a feeling that
people are digging underground, digging below the ocean depths, to
find excuses to add on. It all started with "axis of evil", nations
that were having weapons of mass destruction; then it started with
nations which were terrorizing their neighbors - listen to the word
now - "terrorizing".
Mr. Sharon, for example, found it very convenient to label the
Palestinian freedom fighters as "terrorists". And he found,
unfortunately, great sympathy in the U.S. [with the notion that]
his struggle against the Palestinians is equal to the American, or
the world's, struggle against terrorism. That doesn't really sell
very well with us, but it seems to have found ready acceptance
Now they have advanced that you have to "preempt" in order to stop
terrorism from aligning itself to a rogue state with weapons,
finding evidence of a relationship between Iraq and Al-Qaeda. These
things worry people!
And also, whatever the United Nations people say, the inspectors -
very respected people who appear to be neutral - whatever they say
or the Secretary-General says, are all just brushed aside as not
being germane to the issue. The important thing is that either
"Saddam must go" or "Saddam must be removed" or Iraq must be
invaded. People get worried with all of this terrible hardware
which is being sent to the Middle East from here.
If you go to Nigeria, you will find many people admiring the United
States, sympathizing with America, being grateful for American
concern for poverty in Africa; Agoa; money being put aside for
Aids. You will not find sympathy for terrorists or for Osama Bin
Laden. No Muslim regards Osama as having done a favor for Muslims
because he has put Muslims in a very uncomfortable situation. But
you will also not find anybody sympathizing with the American
position over Iraq.
I have discussed this when I went before the Senate subcommittee on
Africa. People are taking bets - which will be the next country
attacked? Is it Syria? Is it Iran? Is it Saudi Arabia?
Although consistency is not a great ingredient in the cuisine of
international politics, we are human beings and we expect great
people to be consistent. Why the inconsistency in the way Iraq was
dealt with and the way North Korea, for example, is dealt with?
People are asking these things all over Africa; and as the
ambassador of Nigeria, this thing has been worrying me, and I have
seized every opportunity to raise the issue with my American
colleagues and friends.
Q: And how do they respond when you raise this issue?
I do think they accept differences of opinion, but they leave no
doubt that this is not going to change their mind.
Q: So you are resigned to the likelihood of war with Iraq?
A: Oh yes. If I had to bet, I would bet my last dollar or my last
Naira on the fact that there will be a war, unless something
happened; unless President Saddam is removed from power by a coup,
by assassination, by him leaving like the Shah left Iran... unless
any of these happen, I believe there is going to be war.
That makes it look like a personal thing. I know when people become
antagonists and foes like [Winston] Churchill and [Adolf] Hitler or
like [Lyndon] Johnson and Ho Chi Minh you do develop a
personalization of war.People probably think there is a personal
quarrel to be settled between President Bush And Saddam. And it
seems to have come down to that now. There is this one man and
maybe some of his cronies that we see on television - people like
Tariq Aziz. Unless these people are removed, I believe there will
Some people say the war has already started because there are some
troops that have invaded northern Iraq which are said to be helping
the Kurds. So it's a question of "can I eat while we go on talking
about the chicken?"
Q: What are the religious implications for a country like Nigeria,
which has a significant Muslim population or for Africa as a whole?
There will be a lot of protest against the United States. I have
said a number of times there will be protest against the United
States from the students. The U.S. will have to reckon with
students who are free and who have their own views. Particularly
in the north (of Nigeria) they are going to demonstrate.
Nigeria will definitely protest any attempt to attack any country,
particularly with the revelations coming out that this country will
be taken over and ruled in what looks like a colonial occupation.
Nigeria will definitely oppose that. And we do.
But let me tell you what will not happen. I don't think that,
because of this, individual Americans are going to be at risk, that
if they see an individual American they will go and attack him. To
go and say, "This is American property" or "This is an American
living here...he or she has come for Peace Corps, let's go and
attack them." I don't think this will happen in Nigeria. It has not
And I don't think this will push Nigeria to sympathize with
terrorism or people like Osama Bin Laden. People here know the
difference between the brand of Islam in 'Sudan' - by which I mean
Black Africa in a broad sense - and what obtains in Saudi Arabia
which is strict Wahabi. We are always arguing with them when we go
to Haj over what to do, what not to do - things like that. I do not
think that whether they are Muslims in the north or the south of
Nigeria, that they will in any hurry to line up with Osama Bin
Probably the anger in case of war with Iraq will not be so much
with America but with any Arab country that seems to be siding with
them. If there is anybody who will face Africans' physical wrath it
will be any Arab state who is seen to be supporting America
because they are looked on as traitors. It happened in 1990 when
people in Kano [a key city in the Muslim north of Nigeria] were
demonstrating against the Saudi embassy. I don't believe there will
be any breaches of diplomatic relations. This is my own judgement,
which may be wrong, but I don't think so.
Q: There have been stresses and strains within Nigeria between the
Sharia states in the North and the central government in Abuja.
Does a U.S. war with Iraq exacerbate these kinds of strains?
No. That is a homegrown and a home-blooming and home-consumed
problem. I don't think it is going to be exported. But it could
happen accidently. In Kano, it would only take one man to make some
kind of silly remark and you could have some problems there. If
you mean people going about provoking each other, I don't think it
will happen. Sharia is a Nigerian problem and is not particularly
relevant to this United States effort to start a war in Iraq.
Q: As somebody who is experienced in international diplomacy, I
wonder how you feel about the international fall-out from this
U.S.-Iraq crisis. The United Nations is under strain, the Europeans
are deeply divided, there's great polarisation among governments
who used to work together. Does any of that matter for Africa - if
the multilateral institutions are weakened by all of this?
A: We don't know who is serious and who is bluffing. It is a
serious problem. I was talking to some Americans last week - they
were senior people - and they were saying: "You see, we are trying
to push Saddam Hussein. If he know that for certain we are coming
then he is going to comply. This is why we don't like what the
French and the Germans are doing; because they are encouraging
Saddam Hussein to be recalcitrant."
So you see, you don't know, when people are saying these things,
whether they are bluffing or whether they are serious. Are all
these things being said in America as a way to apply pressure? All
this hardware moving east - is this just to apply pressure on
Saddam Hussein or is it really serious?
We don't like it! We don't like it at all! We have no doubt that
with the destruction of the Soviet Union, for whatever reason,
America has a field day; they can do whatever they like.
But, like I was saying, we don't know who is going to be next and
we don't know what's going to happen, for example, with age-old
problems like the Arab-Israeli problem. We don't know what's going
to happen with India and Pakistan. We don't know whether this
pre-emptive strategy is going to be copied by other people -
whether India will attack Pakistan, or whether some people will
destroy their internal opposition by saying they are terrorists.
When you throw a stone and it has left your hand, you don't know
for certain where it will fall.
Date distributed (ymd): 030307
Issue Areas: +political/rights+ +security/peace+ +US policy focus+
The Africa Action E-Journal is a free information service
provided by Africa Action, including both original
commentary and reposted documents. Africa Action provides this
information and analysis in order to promote U.S. and
international policies toward Africa that advance economic,
political and social justice and the full spectrum of