Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail!
Format for print or mobile
Visit AfricaFocus Bookshop US |
Africa/Global: Whose Energy?
May 17, 2017 (170517)
(Reposted from sources cited below)
"We, the undersigned representatives of African civil society, express our deep
concern regarding efforts by the European Union and France to hijack the Africa
Renewable Energy Initiative (AREI), an African-owned and African-led initiative
endorsed by all 55 African Heads of State to scale up renewable energy on our
continent." April 6 statement by Pan African Climate Justice Alliance and over 200
civil society networks and groups from 34 African countries.
In light of the threats to the climate coming from the new U.S. administration, it is
tempting to look to other leading powers, including those in Europe and Asia, to
provide positive examples of international action on climate change. Yet it is also
clear that these actions fall short of what is needed. African activists are taking
the lead in pointing out these inconsistencies.
This AfricaFocus Bulletin includes documents and links illustrating that point, both
on the continent-side statement cited above and on current mobilization in Kenya
against plans for a major new coal plant in Lamu.
For previous AfricaFocus Bulletins on energy-related issues, see
++++++++++++++++++++++end editor's note+++++++++++++++++
NET hearings ongoing in Lamu
Proceedings of court hearings, 11–12 May 2017
deCOALonize: the anti-coal, pro-renewable, pro-community, pro-sustainable development
campaign in Kenya
[Excerpts only: for full report with links and photos, see
https://medium.com/@deCOAL/ - Direct URL: http://tinyurl.com/l3k9xax]
[For additional background see http://www.decoalonize.org/
From 11 to 12 May 2017, Kenya's National Environmental Tribunal (NET) held hearings
in Lamu County to consider community groups' objections regarding the insufficiency
of the proposed Lamu coal plant's Environmental and Social Impact Assessment. They
visited the site and heard from witnesses pertaining to the proposed site, local
community, and its ecosystem.
NET commissioners on site visit to Lamu
The objections were filed by a handful of residents, Save Lamu, and Natural Justice,
in response to the granting of a license for the ESIA by the National Environmental
Management Authority. Following this week's site visit, NEMA will hold a second
hearing in Nairobi later this month.
Media coverage of hearings (to date)
Mainstream media coverage of the 11–12 May National Environmental Tribunal meetings
has been thus far limited to a handful of articles.
A second round of allegations by the County Commissioner Kanyiri accusing anti-coal
plant activists of being "used by cartels" appeared in The Star, despite citing no
evidence. The Star further reported that Lamu Women Representative Shakila Abdalla
pledges to take the matter to High Court (which the community groups already intend
Meanwhile, the Business Daily reported on the anti-coal demonstrations, a silent
march through Lamu town, and community views:
Protestors accused the Lamu County government, the National Environment and
Management Authority (Nema) and the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) of trying to
force the project on them. "We will continue fighting till the end. The project is
harmful and that's why it has been rejected in Kitui and other places in this
country. We will not allow such kind of a project unless they come up with an
alternative and environmental friendly project rather than coal. We are for green
energy," Ishaq Abubakar, a resident opposed to the project said.
[continued at http://tinyurl.com/l3k9xax]
As the World Cuts Back on Coal, a Growing Appetite in Africa
New coal plants in Africa are largely being paid for by China and developed countries
that are turning away from the technology at home. Here's why.
By Jonathan W. Rosen
National Geographic, May 10, 2017
[Excerpts only. For full article see http://news.nationalgeographic.com - Direct URL: http://tinyurl.com/lwtqs7g]
Lamu, Kenya - Few places in the world exude a sense of timelessness as Lamu, an
island off of Kenya's northern coast home to the oldest and best preserved Swahili
settlement in East Africa. Lamu's old town, a UNESCO World Heritage site and an
epicenter of Indian Ocean trade for centuries, is a maze of narrow winding streets
that cut through neighborhoods of limestone and coral houses, past elaborately carved
mahogany doors and several dozen mosques and churches. Only a handful of motor
vehicles are allowed on the island; transportation is mainly the domain of donkeys or
men pushing wooden carts thorough the tropical swelter.
Yet Lamu Island's 24,000 residents are faced with what many here call an existential
crisis. Some 15 miles north of town, on a sparsely populated seaside area of the
mainland formerly used for growing maize, cashews, and sesame, a Kenyan company known
as Amu Power is preparing to erect a $2 billion coal power plant, the first of its
kind in East Africa.
Financed with Chinese, South African, and Kenyan capital, and built by the stateowned
Power Construction Corporation of China, the plant is intended to add 1,050
megawatts of capacity to Kenya's national grid and power operations of an adjacent 32
berth deep-water port. Both are part of an ambitious government plan to transform
Kenya into a newly industrializing, middle-income country by 2030.
The project is controversial in part due to the risks it poses to Lamu's delicate
marine environment, which many fear will harm its two most vital industries: fishing
and tourism. Yet it is also emblematic of Africa's growing appetite for coal, the
most polluting form of power generation, which until now has existed in significant
quantities only in the continent's most industrialized country, South Africa.
According to data compiled by CoalSwarm, an industry watchdog, more than 100 coalgenerating
units with a combined capacity of 42.5 gigawatts are in various stages of
planning or development in 11 African countries outside of South Africa—more than
eight times the region's existing coal capacity. Nearly all are fueled by foreign
investment, and roughly half are being financed by the world's largest coal emitter:
This comes at a time when China and India, which accounted for 86 percent of global
coal development over the last decade, are putting coal projects on hold at record
rates due to existing overcapacity, the lowering cost of renewables, and crippling
pollution that is thought to kill more than a million people a year in the case of
China alone. Many of the world's more developed countries are also in the process of
phasing out the fuel as a power source.
"So many states are now withdrawing coal because of its emissions—because of its
environmental destruction," says Walid Ahmed, a member of Save Lamu, a local
coalition that's trying to stop the Amu Power project. "So we don't see why they
should bring it here."
[for more see http://tinyurl.com/lwtqs7g]
EU, France accused of hijacking 'Africa-led' clean energy scheme
April 27, 2017
African head of $10bn programme quits, saying French environment minister Ségolène
Royal intervened to impose EU-preferred projects
By Megan Darby
http://www.climatechangenews.com - Direct URL: http://tinyurl.com/l3t9su7
[For May 10 amd May 17 updates from Climate Change News, see
Notably, French environment minister Royal has moved ahead with her own plan for
a replacement for the former director.]
A $10bn clean energy programme launched at the Paris climate talks "by Africa, for
Africa" is in turmoil after interventions by the EU and France.
Youba Sokona saw the African Renewable Energy Initiative as a chance for Africans to
take control of climate finance. In a resignation letter obtained by Climate Home, the top official of the Africa
Renewable Energy Initiative (AREI), Youba Sokona, accused donors of a deliberate
strategy to "railroad" Africans into rubber-stamping projects selected by Europeans.
Matters came to a head in Conakry, Guinea, on 4 March, where the board approved 19
projects worth €4.8 billion ($5.2bn). By Sokona's account, the Europeans present
"managed to effectively force through" the list, overriding "a string of
reservations" expressed by some African members.
"There was evident contempt for, and abandonment of, the AREI principles," he wrote.
Youba Sokona (Pic: Flickr/Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung/Stephan Röhl)
When launched, the AREI was vaunted as a scheme to bring clean power to the
continent, on African terms. But many of the projects chosen by European Commission
representatives are neither new, renewable nor owned by Africans.
Sokona announced his resignation on the spot and leaves the post at the end of April,
with no replacement lined up.
French environment minister Ségolène Royal and EU commissioner for international
development Neven Mimica led the non-African delegation at the meeting. Mimica's EU
officials chose the projects, but according to Sokona's letter, Royal asked him to
present them to the AREI board. He refused, on the basis he had not seen the list
until two days earlier.
High-level representatives from Egypt, the African Development Bank – which hosts the
AREI staff – and the African Union expressed concerns at the board meeting about
bypassing the AREI screening process. But the presidents of former French colonies
Chad and Guinea, Idriss Déby and Alpha Condé, aligned with the Europeans in urging
members to give the go-ahead, Climate Home understands.
Two officials from Royal's private office acknowledged there had been disagreement,
but denied Royal had exerted undue influence. President Condé convened the meeting,
they said, and Royal was there to "facilitate".
"Our minister was very keen to help him push forward quickly and efficiently. It was
important for everybody to jump-start the initiative… and not have it bogged down by
governance issues," said Royal's advisors.
This was an "exceptional process", they added. "The decision was made by the Africans
to select the projects as soon as this meeting because they considered that the
projects were ready to be moved forward – despite the fact that the governance is not
fully set up and finalised."
A spokesperson confirmed that the European Commission had identified 14 of the
projects, at the request of the AREI board. Five that had been first presented at UN
climate talks in Marrakech were then added to the list. Minutes of the meeting have
yet to be published, nearly two months later.
The incident is a fracture in the solidarity that allowed rich and poor countries to
reach a climate agreement in Paris. Under the UN deal, many developing countries put
forward their first ever pledges to curb greenhouse gas emissions. Those commitments
hinge on financial support from the developed world. But where the money comes from
and who controls where it goes remain fraught questions.
In this case, donors – which include Canada, the US and Japan as well as EU member
states – pledged to "mobilise" $10 billion by 2020. This is to install 10GW of "new
and additional" clean power capacity across the continent.
But while the African technical team expected this to mean new climate finance, the
developed countries argued for old money to count towards meeting the 10GW goal. In
their joint statement from Paris, they said the money would flow "through a variety
of mechanisms", including a list of existing finance programmes.
The resulting first tranche comes from various development banks and involves only
one euro of public funding to 15 of private investment. Critics say the minimal
public input indicates the projects were already commercially viable. That suggests
the initiative has relabelled business-as-usual, not driven the access to clean
energy Africans need.
The list presented by the EU to Africans includes four large grid infrastructure
projects, which support clean and dirty energy alike1. An interconnector planned for
west Africa will facilitate "large-scale development" of hydropower and natural gas
resources, according to the World Bank.
At least one of the initiatives – the Tendaho geothermal project in Ethiopia – got
funding approval before the AREI launched.
This was all agreed by the African board, Royal's advisors stressed. "A lot of these
projects, they don't come out of a bag just like that, a lot of them have been in the
pipeline for a long time… If it was not for AREI, maybe these projects would still be
Western private investors stand to benefit from the deals. For example, the
privately-owned 30MW Djermaya solar plant in Chad is being developed by a group of
companies headquartered in London, Paris and Toronto. Whatever the side-benefits,
Chadians will pay for this clean energy and the profits end up in Westerners'
This was not the programme Sokona, a Malian with four decades' experience in energy
policy and sustainable development, had in mind.
He laid much of the groundwork for AREI unpaid before being officially appointed to
lead the independent delivery unit from August 2016. In a video on the AREI homepage,
he explains his intention to "reverse the dynamic" whereby aid donors typically set
the agenda. Under his vision, African countries would put forward proposals to be
screened by African technical experts and approved by African leaders.
"It is not energy per se. It is how to change the life of the people, how to give to
them better conditions, better situation and better future.1 The technology is only a
pretext to do that," Sokona said in the video.
By January 2017, Sokona's team had identified a pipeline of 442 projects across
Africa, but not filtered them through AREI criteria. An AREI report on the list of
projects notes the "over-whelming dominance of plans for large regional projects"
rather than "transformative" programmes for energy access and capacity building.
At the same time, Royal was taking matters into her own hands. She had assumed the
presidency of COP21, the historic 2015 Paris climate summit, after the event. This
was a chance to start putting the Paris Agreement into practice. It may also have
bolstered her credentials for an (ultimately unsuccessful) bid to lead the UN
A report presented on the sidelines of the UN general assembly in September 2016 put
Royal's name above the AREI logo. It includes more than 20 photos of her touring
African countries and glad-handing leaders. In the foreword, she hails the
"extraordinary potential" of the initiative. "We… need Africa to be able to make a
real difference with its own solutions," she writes.
Yet in the end, Africans were left out of the loop. Hearing of the Conakry row,
nearly 200 African civil society organisations signed an open letter objecting to the
EU "hijacking" the initiative.
Tasneem Essop, founder of the Energy Democracy Initiative in South Africa, described
the European players' behaviour as "absolutely shocking". "[AREI] was one of the most
inspirational initiatives emerging from Africa. We were so desperate for this kind of
leadership," she told Climate Home.
Far from the focus on community access to clean energy Essop hoped for, the EU list
represented "business as usual". And the way it was imposed was all too reminiscent
of the history of development finance being dictated by the rich. "We thought we had
passed those ways, but this is such an explicit and crude grab, it is mind-boggling
that this could have happened now."
Essop argued that the developed world, which bears most responsibility for causing
global warming, has a duty to support Africa in clean growth. "They [donors] think it
is charity. It is not charity. This is very much part of the obligations under the UN
The civil society letter calls on the EU and France to surrender any aspiration to
board membership and respect the initiative's autonomy. "AREI must be run by Africans
for Africans. Interference in African governance belongs to another era," it says.
Asked how France would rebuild trust in the process, Royal's advisors said: "It is an
African-led initiative and it is really for the Africans to discuss this and make
sure [the process] is inclusive. What our minister can do is mention this to
President Condé and she will work to that effect, as a facilitator."
Stop European Hijacking of the Africa Renewable Energy Initiative
Statement by African Civil Society
April 7, 2017
http://www.pacja.org - Direct URL: http://tinyurl.com/kvbysco
We, the undersigned representatives of African civil society, express our deep
concern regarding efforts by the European Union and France to hijack the Africa
Renewable Energy Initiative (AREI), an African-owned and African-led initiative
endorsed by all 55 African Heads of State to scale up renewable energy on our
AREI (http://www.arei.org) was launched by the African governments with the support
of African citizens during COP21 in Paris, with the goal to provide at least 10
billion watts (10GW) of new and additional renewable energy to Africa's peoples by
2020, and put the continent on course to add at least another 300 GW and achieve
universal access to energy for all Africans by 2030. It was supported by $10 billion
in pledges for 2015-2020 by developed countries in Paris.
AREI as defined in its framework, principles and work plans is a unique initiative.
It is aligned with our values of people-centred approaches, community rights, equity
and a bold vision of Africa taking a global lead towards flourishing societies
powered by clean, renewable energy.
Since Paris, an Independent Delivery Unit was set up to deliver in accordance with
AREI's people-centred principles and approaches. The expectation was that a Board
with Heads of State representing each African sub-region would be established,
supported by a technical committee involving broad representation and participation
by civil society.
AREI's integrity and promise of bringing light and energy to Africa's people is now
being gravely threatened by the efforts of the European Union and France for
premature, undue approval of 'their' projects and seeming attempts to co-opt the
initiative to serve their ends, supported by a small handful of Africans. At a Board
Meeting convened in Conakry on 4 March, we understand the European Union and France
- Publicly "announced the preparation of 19 new renewable energy projects, with a
total potential investment of €4.8 billion" (EU press release 4 March -
http://bit.ly/2mLxiqG) – when they are actually claiming to provide a mere 1/16th or
€0.3 billion of this amount, not all of which is for "new projects" or even for
"renewable energy", and with no clarity whether any of these are "additional'"
- Managed to have rammed through the Board for adoption these partly EU-funded
projects, despite the express objections from some African countries and
institutions, and contrary to the principles of African ownership that would expect
project priorities and proposals to stem directly from African countries
- Ignored and bypassed AREI's own evaluation process in accordance to its criteria (
http://bit.ly/2mwiMDr) – developed with African and northern government, civil
society and otherstakeholder inputs. These require all projects be assessed in line
with AREI social, environmental, gender and other principles and safeguards before
any approvals can be made
- Claiming Board memberships when they seem to have only been invited to the meetings
(AREI minutes of the first inaugural board on 29 January - http://bit.ly/2mY6b82) and
contrary to the idea there should be one developing and one developed non-African
country in the Board.
- Pushed for the imposition of EU technical experts to supposedly take control of
AREI core documents to be consistent with European interests
All the above seems to have caused the Head of the Independent Delivery Unit, a
prominent and well- respected African, to declare his resignation.
These actions have been enabled by one or two African states while the interests of
the majority of States, and of Africans, have been set aside.
While we acknowledge that the EU has scaled up support for African renewables since
COP21 in Paris, these most recent behaviors are completely unacceptable. Recycling
existing projects as "new" ones for AREI virtually ensures it will fail to meet its
goal of 10 billion watts of "new and additional renewable energy generation capacity
by 2020", leaving Africans in the dark.
Listing projects in numerous African countries without their consent means these
countries may miss out on genuinely new and additional resources from AREI in the
future, undermining the legitimate expectations of those countries and their people.
These carefully staged interferences in Africa's institutions threaten not merely the
potential of AREI to deliver new renewable energy, they call into question the
independence and sanctity of African governance arrangements, including the African
Based on these concerns, we call on all African States, leaders and people to demand
genuinely people- centred renewable energy for Africa, building on the great model
set out by AREI and endorsed by all African countries.
- That the European Union and France step aside and abandon any aspirations to have
seats as Board members, and ensure AREI remains African-led and African-owned. AREI
must be run by Africans for Africans. Interference in African governance belongs to
- Full accountability, transparency and participation must be provided for African
states and for civil society in all aspects of AREI. The Initiative cannot and must
not become a tool for one or two African States to benefit themselves or their
- That any 'endorsement' by the Board of the 19 existing EU projects is indefinitely
suspended until a thorough review against AREI Criteria, environmental and social
safeguards, prior informed consent by the States and citizens concerned, and active
civil society participation are undertaken. It must be for individual African states
and people, not the EU, to propose projects to AREI.
- That all further funding and projects through AREI be genuinely "new and
additional" to ensure the delivery of real outcomes for our people, with no more
accounting tricks, and to ensure that developed countries are accountable and meet
their financial obligations.
- That active participation by all civil society constituencies is ensured at all
levels of AREI including its governing bodies, its workplan and project development,
and project implementation on the ground.
- That African countries immediately take action to put AREI back on track and
ensure full independence for the Independent Delivery Unit from donors, the African
Development Bank and other third parties, and the reinstatement of its Head
We call for all partners in government, academia, faith-based, labour, gender,
environmental, community-based organizations, national coalitions and regional and
international networks to join us in championing a truly African-led and peoplecentred
approach to renewable energy on our continent. AREI needs to succeed.
We hereby sign on to this statement:
Regional Groups & Networks
Pan-African Climate Justice Alliance (PACJA) Kenya [Full list includes almost 200
civil society groups and networks from Algeria, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroun, Chad,
Djibouti, DR Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, Cote d'Ivoire, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia,
Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria,
Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo,
Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe
[Note: an statement of support for the African civil society demands was circulating as this AfricaFocus was prepared. As of today, May 18, the final statement was released and is available here, including a list of 111 signatory organizations from around the world.]
Key excerpts are as follows:
"We, the undersigned organizations, are writing to express our dismay at the actions of France
and the European Commission regarding the governance of the Africa Renewable Energy
Initiative (AREI), and to show our support for the demands of African civil society to reverse
"For all these reasons, we fully support the demands of African civil society to
reverse recent developments and put the AREI and its leadership and governance back
on track, as outlined in their recent statement."
"The AREI is an African-led initiative that, with proper governance, has the
potential to address the energy needs of African peoples and the planet's climate
challenges. Only by respecting the initiative's African sovereignty, ensuring
projects are aligned with AREI criteria, and providing genuine support can the EU and
France help to meet these goals."
AfricaFocus Bulletin is an independent electronic publication providing reposted
commentary and analysis on African issues, with a particular focus on U.S. and
international policies. AfricaFocus Bulletin is edited by William Minter.
AfricaFocus Bulletin can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org. Please write to this
address to suggest material for inclusion. For more information about reposted
material, please contact directly the original source mentioned. For a full archive
and other resources, see http://www.africafocus.org