Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail!
Format for print or mobile
Zimbabwe: Women Continue Protest at Hwange Coal
March 26, 2018 (180326)
(Reposted from sources cited below)
At a meeting on February 11, two weeks into a protest by hundreds of women in the
mining community outside the company's offices, still continuing in late March, the
Hwange Colliery Company Ltd. (HCCL) admitted that the company owed its workers a
total of $70 million. HCCL management said they did not have the money to pay,
although many workers had not been paid full wages for almost five years.
HCCL has been one of the most notorious cases of "wage theft," pervasive throughout
both private and state-owned companies in Zimbabwe in recent years, as documented in
a report in 2016 (http://tinyurl.com/y7ewon3g), based on extensive research by the
Labour and Economic Development Research Institute of Zimbabwe (LEDRIZ). Workers have
gone without pay or been dismissed without agreed severance benefits, while managers
have continued to enjoy high salaries and murky accounting obscures the income paid
to investors. In the case of HCCL, the company is 43% owned by government and 26% by
British businessman Nicholas van Hoogstraten. Van Hoogstraten has been a resident in
Zimbabwe and a close associate of recently ousted President Robert Mugabe, while
being accused of having murdered a business rival in England.
This case is also exceptional in that the HCCL coal-mining operation
represents a declining industry with antiquated technology, in which investment in
modernization would further endanger the climate as well as being unprofitable. Yet
it is the workers and their families who are bearing the costs.
It is also notable that the protests, led principally by women in the mining
community, began as early as 2013, and have achieved some limited successes. They
have gained support and ongoing engagement by trade unions and civil society
organizations in Zimbabwe as well as internationally. These have included the
Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU), the Centre for Natural Resource Governance
(CNRG), Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR), and Women and Law in Southern
Africa (WLSA). And, in recent weeks, political pressure at the national level to take
action has also been rising.
Since the latest protests began at the end of January, the company is reported to
have has paid 5.2% of outstanding back wages, on top of 7% paid in early 2017. But
neither the company nor the government has promised to do more than review the
possibility of further payments, falling far short of demands by workers and
This AfricaFocus Bulletin contains a mid-March background report on the Hwange
protest from the Centre for Natural Resource Governance, followed by a short list of
additional resources of interest.
For updates on the protests, use the following custom Google search for articles
appearing after January 28, 2018:
For previous AfricaFocus Bulletins on Zimbabwe, visit
++++++++++++++++++++++end editor's note+++++++++++++++++
Fighting for the unpaid labor of Hwange Women
Centre for Natural Resource Governance
[Report distributed by email and available at
Additional information available at the website of CNRG http://www.cnrgzim.org]
1. Introduction and Background
For five years now, the Hwange Colliery Company Limited (HCCL), Zimbabwe’s biggest
coal mining company that is partly owned by the government, has failed to pay its
workers their dues, as well as the benefits entitled to widows of its workers.
Although there is evidence that the company has not stopped selling its produce, it
has for the past few years been declaring losses. The company’s workers believe the
loss-making rhetoric is a tactic by the management to justify their not being paid
Coal production in Hwange (called Wankie in the colonial period) dates back to the
late 19th century, the oldest of Zimbabwe's coal production operations. Underground and surface mines feed a 920MW-capacity coalfired
power plant which provides electricity to the national grid. It was also the site of
one of the most deadly coal mine disasters in history, when 426 miners died as a result of an underground explosion in 1972.
Unable to cope with the dire situation any longer, widows and spouses of the
company’s unpaid workers as well as some female former workers got together and
resolved to confront the company by holding demonstrations at its head office,
demanding their long overdue remunerations.
However, the struggle of these women dates back to 2013 when they organised their
first demonstration against the non-payment of their spouses’ salaries. But back
then, before the demonstration could really start, the then trigger-happy Zimbabwe
Republic Police officers in Hwange, was engaged by HCCL and descended on the placardcarrying
women as they made their way to the company head office and assaulted them
heavily. This was to signal a premature end to the women's first attempt at
demonstrating against the non-payment of their spouses’ salaries by the company.
However, in December 2014 CNRG began working with the women in Hwange, conducting
capacity building workshops as well as sharing non-violent strategies for direct
action. CNRG facilitated exchange visits between the women of Hwange and women from
other mining-affected communities in Zimbabwe and in the region. CNRG also
facilitated the participation of Hwange women at feminist training schools organized
by WoMIN regional alliance. Thus a new and vibrant movement was born in Hwange.
Meanwhile, HCCL still has not paid its current and former workers their outstanding
dues and has more than once reneged on its promise to settle the arrears in
instalments. The least owed worker today is owed more than $5,000.
As the company continued to default on salary payments, the women became the
breadwinners, sustaining their families – including the HCCL employees— mostly
through informal trading and working numerous menial jobs. Thus the women subsidized
the HCCL by supplementing their spouses’ slashed earnings, but the HCCL has never
acknowledged the unpaid labor of these women.
Unable to take the injustice any longer, spouses of HCCL's current and former
workers, as well as other female former workers, converged to once again express
their discontent in the form of a demonstration. At a workshop held at the colliery
by CNRG and Women and Law in Southern Africa (WLSA) in December 2017, the women
started discussions about non-violent direct action to demand their spouses’ dues. On
January 29 2018 the women went and pitched a tent at the entrance to HCCL offices,
where they are camped to this very day demanding what the company owes their
Privilege Musvanhiri on Twitter, January 30, 2018
Hwange Colliery workers wives demonstrated for payment of their husbands’ salaries.
Pics by @RutendoMapfumo]
There is a good reason why it is their spouses instead of the workers themselves who
are demonstrating: the company is in the habit of victimising any worker that raises
their voice against any injustice. To spare their husbands the victimisation, the
women decided it was safer that they be the ones to protest.
It has been over a month with the women camped outside the company offices, braving
the rough weather which has over the last month been characterised by harsh winds,
heavy rains and some heat waves in between, in their fight for a better life for
their families that are currently in the clutches of poverty.
This report will focus on the plight of the Hwange women and their families as a
result of non-payment of their husbands’ salaries by Hwange Colliery Company and the
efforts that they, with support and encouragement from CNRG and WLSA, have been
making to force the coal-mining company to pay what it owes. It will also touch on
the impact that the non-payment has had on their families and on them as women. The
report will conclude by mentioning CNRG’s efforts to strengthen women in miningaffected
communities like Hwange to allow them to be able to uphold their rights.
2. Unpaid salaries sink families into abject poverty
Hwange Colliery Company Limited , a mining company that prides itself as being
Zimbabwe’s major explorer, miner, processor and marketer of coal and associated byproducts,
producing over 750,000 tonnes of coal per year and sometime exceeding that
target in order to satisfy its domestic customers that include Zimbabwe Power
Company, National Foods, Stable Chemicals, small-scale tobacco farmers, Dunlop, Boc
Gases, Zimchem Refineries, sugar refineries, Macdonald Bricks and Delta Beverages,
among others and exporting to more than 13 countries which include Zambia, Democratic
Republic of Congo, Mozambique, South Africa, Belgium, China and Russia, has not been
paying its workers their salaries for over five years. This is in spite of the
mining company glowingly describing itself on its website as a socially responsible
company that cares deeply for the Hwange community. On its website it wrote:
“Hwange is unique in many ways. It is a mining town, a Company and a coal town, but
owing to its remote location, it has developed as a self-contained community. In
order to attract and keep staff, the Company has to maintain high standards of
housing, health, shopping, schooling and recreational facilities.”
If HCCL adhered to what it claims on its website, Hwange would be a happy town full
of healthy and thriving people. Instead, the opposite is true. According to its
workers and their spouses, Hwange Colliery Company Limited has become the very source
of their anguish and has turned into a task master that shows little care for its own
employees and the residents of Hwange town at large. The neglect of its workers, who
had come to depend on it for their survival, has seen the town and communities that
surround it sinking deep into poverty and unless measures are urgently put in place
to restore the area, Hwange town risks becoming a ghost town in less than ten years.
Without money, parents are finding it very hard to keep their children in school. It
is now common to see young men loitering purposelessly in the area, while some very
young girls who would have dropped out of school are engaging in commercial sex work,
thereby putting their lives at risk.
The majority of the company houses that the workers’ families live in are
dilapidated, with most of them full of huge cracks, thereby putting the lives of the
occupants in danger. Some have since succumbed to the deterioration and have caved
in, posing serious danger to the occupants. Research carried out by CNRG in 2016
indicated that workers’ quarters lack maintenance, with the ablution facilities in an
appalling state, forcing over 200 people to share a single toilet. Hwange women
reiterated that their situation was a ticking time bomb as anytime, the area could
see a spread of diseases such as cholera and typhoid.
Despite the company houses’ deplorable condition, the company has been threatening to
evict its former workers from the houses, even though they have not been paid their
dues to allow them to seek better accommodation.
Furthermore, while the company continues to claim its productivity levels do not
allow them to timely pay its impoverished employees, the company’s disgruntled
workers report that top management at HCCL has continued to live affluent lifestyles,
with reports of them recently buying for top managers top-of-the-range vehicles that
cost between USD$50 000 and $100 000. This is in addition to reportedly paying
themselves allowances and each manager receiving monthly fuel coupons. According to
one employee who refused to be named for fear of victimization, top management is
paid from a different payroll from the rest of the workers, with their money being
processed in the capital city, Harare. The rest of the workers therefore suspect
management has continued to pay each other while the rest of the workers go without
receiving anything for months on end. Meanwhile, investigations carried out by CNRG
unveiled that the coal mining company owes each worker salaries ranging from $5 000
to $50 000—substantial amounts that would, if paid, allow many Hwange families to
rise out of their current state of poverty.
2.1 Women’s unpaid labor
The HCCL management has failed to understand why women who are not on their workers’
register are demonstrating against the company. But protesting women have a very
strong and legitimate reason why they are demonstrating at the company premises. It
is because they are the ones who have over the years being bearing the brunt of the
poverty brought into their homes by their spouses’ situation. The women have been
subsidizing the HCCL since 2013 when the company stopped paying its employees their
full salaries by taking on the role of breadwinners. The workers have been able to
continue reporting for duty for the past five years because most of them were being
sustained by their wives.
According to some of the protesting women, they are now their families’ sole
breadwinners as they have been taking care of their spouses and children, a feat they
say has greatly been weighing them down. The women credit themselves for the
continuation of production at HCCL, saying without their support, their husbands
would have stopped reporting for work years ago. To take care of their families, the
women have been engaging in various forms of informal economic activities ranging
from cross border trade, buying and selling airtime, farming, vending vegetables to
mobile canteens and working other menial jobs that include doing people’s laundry,
gardening and cleaning houses. Some have established stokvel credit unions which they
call “societies” where members contribute fixed sums of money to a central fund on a
monthly basis which is paid to one member at a time. This has enabled some of the
women to invest in small business projects which they use to sustain their families.
It is such economic activities that have helped to ensure their spouses report for
duty at HCCL.
However, the HCCL has not in any way acknowledged how much the women have contributed
into ensuring that the company continues to function by taking on the role of
breadwinners after it stopped paying their husbands. Instead, the company has been
treating the women as a pestilence that is disrupting the normal flow of business at
the company and needs to be gotten rid of. Instead of attending to their concerns
that resulted in them carrying out the demonstration, the company has continuously
been appealing to the courts to have the women removed from its premises, a sign the
company doesn't feel it owes the women anything.
2.2 Hwange Colliery Company’s heavy-handedness
Five years ago, on October 7, 2013, five months after HCCL had stopped paying its
workers, the wives of the company’s workers and widows of its former workers decided
to demonstrate to force the company to pay, citing the poverty that had been brought
upon their lives by the non-payment. Instead of engaging them to address the matter
as the women had hoped, their attempt at demonstrating was met with force and fury as
the company engaged the services of Hwange police to deal with the demonstrators. The
overzealous police did not take long before they descended on the women, severely
assaulting the placard-waving women as they marched to the company’s head office. The
assault the women suffered at the hands of the ruthless police was to see them
relenting—effectively bringing to an end what could have been a successful expression
of their disgruntlement.
Five years later, in 2018, HCCL still hasn’t paid what it owes its workers and the
amounts have spiraled out of control. If the suffering that fell on the company’s
families when the company stopped paying them in 2013 was bad enough to warrant their
taking to the streets in protest, then one can only imagine how much the situation
has deteriorated more than five years down the line.
Hwange Colliery infrastructure is old and inefficient.
It reportedly features the
last steam locomotive in commercial use on the African continent.
2.3 Hwange Colliery Company again turns antagonistic
When the women began their protest, setting their camp about 500 meters away from the
Administration block entrance on January 29 2018, they hoped this time the company
would heed their plea. However, HCCL again turned antagonistic and in a move
reminiscent of 2013, the company’s first reaction to the demonstration was to engage
the police in an attempt to disperse the demonstrators.
But in an unprecedented move, Hwange police this time declined to assist, citing that
the demonstrators had the right to protest in terms of section 59 of the
Constitution. Instead, all that the police offered to do was to ensure that the
demonstration was peaceful, and true to their word, police officers have ensured the
protest is conducted peacefully.
2.4 HCCL starts feeling the pressure
On Sunday 11 February 2018 the company called for what it termed “an all stakeholders
meeting” which was attended by the workers committee, trade unions, retired employees
who were owed money, representatives of demonstrating women, widows of former mine
employees, retired former managerial employees who are also owed money, pensioners,
the Ministry of Labour, the police, Zimbabwe Defence Forces (ZDF) and Chief Shana of
In the meeting, HCCL admitted that the company owed its workers a total of $70
million, however emphasising that its workers were not the only people it owed as it
owed all its creditors a total of $352 million. HCCL management said they did not
have the money to pay what then company owed its current and former workers, but
could only pay if sales improve, saying that the previously agreed “Scheme of
Arrangement” remained the only way to settle the matter. The said Scheme of Agreement
was first agreed on in 2015 after workers had suggested appealing to the government
to have HCCL placed under judiciary management; a move management was naturally
opposed to. In an attempt to quell the fire, management agreed that it would, in a
period of four years and six months, pay everyone it owed 23% of what was owed.
However, the company has reneged on its agreement with the workers under the said
Scheme of Arrangement and has to date only paid workers 12.2% out of the 23% they had
agreed on in 2015, with the money paid only when those owed put the management under
pressure to pay.
At the meeting, workers had a chance to personally detail their plight, telling the
management how they were failing to fend for their families, their failure to pay
school and university fees for their children, lack of medical care and the threat of
evictions from company houses, among other problems.
But in the end, seeing that HCCL management was not being sincere, the
representatives of the women demonstrators walked out before the end of the meeting.
Meanwhile, the demonstration continued gaining momentum by the day.
2.5 The matter spills into courts
On February 7, the HCCL approached the High Court in Bulawayo seeking to be granted
an order to bar the Hwange women from continuing to demonstrate on its premises. It
was an act designed to further compel the police to evict the women, but the Bulawayo
High Court threw out the case.
On February 28, HCCL took the matter to Harare High Court where it hoped to get a
more favorable ruling and made an application under the Certificate of Urgency to
have the demonstrators evicted. In this case the company cited Acting Commissioner
General of police Edwin Matanga and Hwange Police Station Officer in Charge, Chief
Inspector James Ngoma as respondents for their failure to disperse the demonstrators.
In a decision that brought wild cheers from the women, CNRG and many members of the
public that attended the court hearing in solidarity with the Hwange women, the judge
Justice Makoni who presided over the matter, dismissed it on the grounds that it was
a case that was very far from warranting urgency, also citing section 59 of the
Constitution that affords people the right to protest.
2.6 Government’s inaction
At first, the government, who has a 37 percent controlling stake in HCCL,
surprisingly remained mum on the situation. It was only when HCCL had failed to
disperse the demonstrators that government resolved to send the Home Affairs minister
Obert Mpofu to address the demonstrators. By sending Obert Mpofu, whose only
relevance was that he hails from Matabeleland North province where HCCL is situated,
the workers and the demonstrating women felt that government had trivialized and
politicized the crisis.
It soon became apparent to the demonstrators that Mpofu had only been sent to use his
political clout to persuade them to disperse, and not to attend to their concerns.
Infuriated, the women told Mpofu he was not the right person to address them and
asked him not to come back to address them if he had no solution to their problems.
After the women had maintained their resolve, clearly unmoved by Minister Mpofu’s
plea for them to disperse, the government on March 7 sent the Minister of Labour
Petronella Kagonye. After being locked in marathon meetings with HCCL management that
lasted for more than seven hours, Minister Kagonye finally called into the meeting
the demonstrators’ representatives, questioning them on why they were demonstrating
when they were not employed by HCCL. The minister went on to tell the women the
nonpayment matter was between the company and its workers and it was being attended
to, telling the women they had no business being camped at the company’s premises and
ordering them to immediately disperse.
While the Labour minister’s visit resulted in the announcement that going forward
HCCL would pay its workers their full salaries as it works on fulfilling its pledges
under the Scheme of Agreement, which would bring relief to many families if the
promise is fulfilled, the women have resolved to remain camped at the company
premises until the promised money starts reflecting in their bank accounts. This is a
move that CNRG hails because the company is in the habit of backing out of its
promises and has over the years proven it cannot be trusted to keep its word.
In its intervention measures, the government has shown more determination to stop the
demonstrating women in order to bring back order to the company more than attending
to the women’s concerns.
Additionally, the situation in Hwange is continually attracting the attention of
political players, some of who seem to see it as an opportunity to further their
political interests. On March 6, the women demonstrators received a visit from Joice
Mujuru, who expressed concern for their movement, encouraging them to continue.
Ironically, Mujuru was the country’s vice president when the company, in which the
government is the major shareholder, started crumbling as a result of mismanagement.
After she departed, the women were left convinced the visit had been nothing but an
election campaign as she intends to run for president in the upcoming elections.
In response to the unfair treatment of women in mining areas, Centre for Natural
Resource Governance is implementing a three-year movement building project for women
affected by mining in Hwange, Mutoko, Penhalonga, Marange, Darwendale and Bikita.
Supported by the Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa (OSISA), the project
aims at strengthening the voice of women affected by extractive industries so they
can defend their economic, social and cultural rights in the wake of extractivism. A
critical mass of women is rising to challenge the model of extractivism prevailing in
Zimbabwe, which values profits over people’s welfare.
Selected Additional resources:
Report on the Situation of Coal Mining in Hwange:
Special Focus on Hwange Colliery Company
CNRG, July 2016
Nyasha Muchichwa, Working without Pay: Wage Theft in Zimbabwe. Solidarity Center,
http://www.solidaritycenter.org – Direct URL:
"Address Grievances of Hwange Colliery Workers: ZCTU," Spiked, February 14, 2018.
http://spiked.co.zw – Direct URL: http://tinyurl.com/y8hf9nno
Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) meeting with Hwange women protesters,
February 1, 2018 - 15 minute video
Conversation mostly in Ndebele and Shona. For backgroound article in English, see the
"100 days of snubbing Zimbabwean workers," Industiall glboal union federation, March
http://www.industriall-union.org – Direct URL: http://tinyurl.com/yauj2zpf
Steam locomotive at Hwange Colliery, July 2017 – 7.5 minute video
AfricaFocus Bulletin is an independent electronic publication providing reposted
commentary and analysis on African issues, with a particular focus on U.S. and
international policies. AfricaFocus Bulletin is edited by William Minter.
AfricaFocus Bulletin can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org. Please write to this
address to suggest material for inclusion. For more information about reposted
material, please contact directly the original source mentioned. For a full archive
and other resources, see http://www.africafocus.org